Table of Contents
- Should AI Be Used in Education?
- The Power of the Partnership: Benefits of AI in Education
- Addressing the Risks: Cons and Ethical Considerations
- Indiana in Action: Moving from Theory to Practice
- Planning for Success: The Framework
- The Future: From Content to Capabilities
- A Final Word to Our Leaders: The Path Forward
- ADDENDUM: Master the Prompt with CO-STAR
- LEADER’S CHECKLIST: Preparing Your District for AI
The conversation about AI in education usually falls into two camps. You have people ready to automate the whole classroom and others who want to ban the tech entirely. But for those of us watching the global economy change in real-time, the middle ground isn’t just about compromise. It is about responsibility.
As leaders and educators in Indiana, we aren’t just managing a new piece of software. We are navigating a fundamental shift in how humans work, create, and communicate.
Should AI Be Used in Education?
The short answer is yes. But the “why” matters much more than the “if.” We are standing at a pivotal moment. Indiana has made great strides in innovation and often leads the nation in these conversations. However, being a leader doesn’t mean the race is over. It means we have a bigger responsibility to keep moving.
The Workforce Transformation
Why should AI be used in education? Because the workforce our students are entering has already changed. From entry-level admin roles to data science, AI is no longer a future skill. It is a baseline requirement. If we don’t get ahead and start preparing our teachers and students to navigate this space now, we aren’t just failing to innovate. We are actively leaving our graduates behind.
The Urgency of the Now: Reclaiming Teacher Time
We don’t have the luxury of waiting for the perfect policy. While we must be thoughtful about the ethical side of things, we can’t let caution turn into a standstill. Every semester we spend in a “wait and see” mode is another semester where our students fall behind peers who are learning to use these tools as a second brain.
I often hear from educators that “lack of time” is the single biggest barrier to innovation. And they are right. Teachers are tasked with doing so many things with so little time that the idea of “one more thing” can be incredibly daunting.
But here is the reality: AI isn’t “one more thing” to do. It is the tool that helps you do the “things” faster. When we use AI to handle the mundane, repetitive tasks that come with teaching, we reclaim time. That is time we can spend working directly with students, providing opportunities for real learning, and actually being the mentors we entered this profession to be.
The Power of the Partnership: Benefits of AI in Education
When we talk about how AI can be used in education, we need to look past the surface-level novelty. The real benefits show up when we stop seeing AI as a replacement and start seeing it as a partner that scales our human impact.
1. Your Always-On Lesson Planning Partner
Every teacher knows the pressure of preparing for Monday morning. That feeling of trying to prep three different levels of a lesson for the coming week is exhausting. AI changes this from a solo marathon into a collaborative sprint.
- Standards Alignment: AI can instantly help align a creative project idea with Indiana State Standards. This ensures your most innovative lessons are still rooted in required learning.
- Drafting and Iteration: Instead of staring at a blank screen, you can use AI to generate a first draft of a lesson plan. This includes learning objectives, primary sources, and even checks for understanding.
2. The Speed of Feedback
Feedback is only effective if it’s timely. In a traditional classroom, a student might wait a week to get a graded essay back. By then, the learning moment has passed.
- Immediate Scaffolding: We are already seeing tools that provide students with instant, actionable feedback during the learning process. Educators Lauren and Emily share how they use one of these tools in their secondary classrooms. Instead of waiting for a teacher to circulate to their desk, a student can receive a targeted hint on a math problem or a structural suggestion on an essay draft the moment they need it.
- Refining, Not Replacing: This lets the teacher spend less time on routine corrections and more time on high-level conversations with the students who need it most.
3. Differentiation as a Reality
We’ve talked about “differentiation” for decades. But doing it well for every student is incredibly hard. AI makes true personalization possible at scale.
- Leveling Content: You can take a complex article and generate versions for five different reading levels in seconds.
- Support for Diverse Learners: For students with IEPs or those learning English, AI provides instant translations and visual aids. This helps them stay engaged with grade-level content alongside their peers.
Addressing the Risks: Cons and Ethical Considerations
I am an enthusiastic adopter, but I’m not blind to the risks. To move forward, we have to plan for the downsides. These aren’t just bugs. They are fundamental shifts in how we define academic integrity and school culture.
1. The Integrity Challenge: Reframing the “Cheating” Conversation
The most common misconception I hear is that AI is simply a new tool for cheating. Let’s be honest: students have found ways to cheat since the first schoolhouse doors opened. Whether it was whispering in the back of the room, passing notes, or copying a neighbor’s paper, the “product” has always been at risk.
If we treat AI as a taboo cheating tool, we push it into the shadows. Instead, we need to treat it as an opportunity. By providing guidance on how to use AI responsibly, we move it from something that replaces thinking to something that develops and grows students as “thinkers and doers.” We have to stop grading the final product and start valuing the struggle and iteration of the process.
2. Critical Thinking and Creativity
There is a real fear that if AI does the thinking, students’ mental muscles will atrophy. We have to be careful not to use AI as an “easy button.” Our role is to teach students that AI is a co-pilot, not the pilot. Creativity in an AI world looks like curation and synthesis. These skills actually require more critical thinking, not less.
3. The Environmental and Resource Cost: A Lifecycle Perspective
This is a deep ethical concern that often goes ignored. Running large language models requires massive amounts of energy and water for cooling data centers. However, we have to recognize that environmental impacts are almost always greatest at the advent of any new technology.
As the technology matures, these impacts inevitably come down. We are already seeing models become more efficient and data centers move toward renewable energy. Furthermore, increasing AI literacy actually helps reduce this footprint. When users know how to use AI more efficiently—asking better questions and reducing unnecessary “compute”—they naturally reduce the environmental impact. Part of being a responsible citizen is learning how to use our tools with the smallest possible footprint.
4. The Digital Divide 2.0
We are at risk of creating a new “AI Divide.” If some students have paid “Pro” versions at home while others have no access at all, the achievement gap will grow. For superintendents and school boards, ensuring equitable access to these tools isn’t just a tech issue. It is a matter of educational justice.
Indiana in Action: Moving from Theory to Practice
It’s one thing to talk about potential. It’s another to see it working. In Indiana, districts like Franklin Township and Madison Consolidated Schools are already leading the way.
The Franklin Township Model

Under Superintendent Dr. Chase Huotari and Director Nadine Gilkison, Franklin Township has been a standout. They didn’t start with a mandate. They started with empathy. Nadine saw how AI could help students with dyslexia navigate school more independently.
- The SchoolAI Pilot: They used a digital learning grant to pilot SchoolAI. This gave students a safe “sandbox” to interact with AI tutors.
- The Result: Students who used to struggle with starting an essay were suddenly empowered to work on their own. By focusing on safety as a design challenge rather than a compliance hurdle, they’ve made AI a natural part of the classroom.
The Madison Consolidated Strategy
Madison Consolidated Schools is solving the “scale” problem. They knew they couldn’t just have a few “techy” teachers. They needed a culture of literacy.
- Train-the-Trainer: Partnering with the Central Indiana Educational Service Center (CIESC) and the SAIL team, they built a leadership pipeline.
- Sustainable Growth: Instead of relying on outside consultants, they are developing their own internal experts. This ensures the momentum stays alive in every school building.
Planning for Success: The Framework
Random acts of technology don’t lead to change. To give districts a roadmap, Keep Indiana Learning champions the AI Integration Framework developed by Michigan Virtual. By adopting this framework, Indiana schools can follow a research-backed model. It covers eight pillars: Leadership, Policy, Instruction, Assessment, Student Use, Professional Learning, Operations, and Ethics.
Detailed information on the eight pillars can be found on the KINL AI Framework page.
Deepening the Conversation: Dual Book Study Guide
For leadership teams ready to dive deeper, the Dual Book Study Guide is an essential companion. It provides a structured way to engage with two of the most influential texts in the field: AI for Educators by Matt Miller and Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick.
This guide goes beyond simple questions to include:
- Video Roadmap: A guide for an accompanying video series that breaks down complex AI concepts.
- Interactive Tasks: Exercises like the “Assignment Redesign” and “Human-in-the-Loop” challenges.
- Action Planning: Tools to help educators develop an AI Ethos Statement and 30-day implementation plans.
Download the Dual Book Study Guide: Strategic Implementation Roadmap
The Future: From Content to Capabilities
In five years, the most profound shift won’t be the tech. It will be our definition of success. Education has been built on content delivery for a century. But in the AI era, facts are a click away.
The role of the teacher is moving from a focus on content to a focus on skills. We are moving toward “thinking” classrooms where students don’t just perform for a grade. They will be “learning architects” who facilitate high-humanity experiences like debates and mentoring.
A workforce-ready graduate in 2030 will be defined by their ability to iterate, give feedback, and think ahead. These skills translate to both human work and work with AI.
A Final Word to Our Leaders: The Path Forward
When we look at the potential of AI in our schools, it is easy to get caught up in the logistics of software and policy. But for school boards, superintendents, and building leaders, this isn’t just a technical challenge. It is a leadership challenge.
We are at a point where the world is moving too fast for a “wait and see” approach. Every day we delay is a day our students lose ground in a global economy that is already being rewritten by these tools. But this isn’t just about speed. It is about a fundamental commitment to the people in our buildings.
Leading in the AI era means:
- Protecting our Teachers: It means giving them the time they need to grow. We have to be the ones who say that AI isn’t about doing more work, but about reclaiming the heart of teaching.
- Empowering our Students: It means shifting our focus from what students can memorize to how they can think. We have to be brave enough to redesign our assessments and our classrooms to value critical thinking and interpersonal skills over simple performance.
- Ensuring Equity: It means refusing to let the digital divide grow. We must ensure that every student in Indiana, regardless of their zip code, has the literacy and access they need to thrive.
The tools are here. The frameworks are ready. The success stories in districts like Franklin Township and Madison Consolidated prove that it can be done. Now, we need the collective courage to lead our districts into this new era. Let’s stop debating if we should start and focus on how we can work together to ensure Indiana remains a leader in preparing students for the world they will actually inherit.
ADDENDUM: Master the Prompt with CO-STAR
To get the best results from AI, you have to move past simple one-sentence questions. At Keep Indiana Learning, we recommend using the CO-STAR framework. This ensures the AI has all the context it needs to be a truly useful partner.
- C – Context: Provide background information on the task. “I am teaching 8th-grade science, and we are starting a unit on plate tectonics.”
- O – Objective: Define the specific task you want the AI to perform. “Create three different ‘hook’ activities to start the first lesson.”
- S – Style: Specify the writing style you want. “Use an enthusiastic and curious tone that appeals to middle school students.”
- T – Tone: Set the attitude of the response. “Make the activities hands-on and collaborative.”
- A – Audience: Identify who the response is for. “The audience is 13 to 14-year-old students with varying reading levels.”
- R – Response: Dictate the format. “Provide these as a bulleted list with estimated time requirements for each activity.”
LEADER’S CHECKLIST: Preparing Your District for AI
For school board members and administrators, the transition starts with these four steps:
- Audit Your Current AUP: Does your Acceptable Use Policy actually mention generative AI, or is it still written for the 2010s?
- Prioritize Privacy: Vet every tool for FERPA and COPPA compliance. Do not trade student data for free features.
- Build the “Human” Bridge: Fund professional development that focuses on AI literacy, not just “how to use an app.”
- Communicate with Parents: Be transparent about how AI is being used. Fear grows in the dark; clarity builds trust.
Resources
Please login or register to claim PGPs.
Alternatively, you may use the PGP Request Form if you prefer to not register an account.




